FRTN65
Lab 1 - Competition: Music taste prediction
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • My dashboard
  • FRTN65
  • Assignments
  • Lab 1 - Competition: Music taste prediction
2023 HT/Autumn
  • Home
  • Modules
  • Quizzes
  • Assignments
  • Syllabus

Lab 1 - Competition: Music taste prediction

  • Due Oct 1, 2023 by 11:59pm
  • Points 1
  • Submitting a file upload
  • Available after Sep 11, 2023 at 5pm

Instructions

Here are the instructions for the assignment Download instructions for the assignment. This is an individual task, but you are allowed to cooperate if you want to. However, your hand-in must be written by you personally, and plagiarizing other persons' hand-ins is not allowed.

We provide lab_song_classification.ipynb Links to an external site. as a simple example of how to get started.

Or if you prefer to handle things on your own you have the files:

  • knn-example.py Download knn-example.py
  • training_data.csv Download training_data.csv
  • songs_to_classify.csv Download songs_to_classify.csv
  • readme.txt Download readme.txt

 

Send in your prediction (a string of 200 numbers, 0 or 1, e.g., 01010010110101000...) to the scoreboard server Links to an external site..

 

Deadline for report/presentation and code: 2023-10-01

If your report/presentation or code is not approved, you will be granted only one additional opportunity to revise and resubmit it. The final deadline for resubmission of the report/presentation and code is 2023-10-22.

 

Mandatory peer review ("kamratgranskning")

Do not submit your peer review as a "new attempt"---use the built-in system in Canvas to submit your peer review.

You need to peer review two other Lab 1 hand-ins which you will be assigned via Canvas.

A good peer review should comment on the following:

  • Does the hand-in contain a presentation or report, and the code needed to reproduce the findings?
  • Has data been properly investigated and handled?
  • Has a reasonable selection of features been done, and motivated?
  • Has a reasonable choice of modeling method(s) been done?
  • Are choices of parameters described and motivated?
  • Has the performance of each method been properly evaluated?

Your peer review must contain detailed motivations. I.e., only leaving yes/no answers (or similar) to the questions above is not acceptable and will lead to a failing grade on your peer review. 

Deadline for peer reviews: 2023-10-08

If your peer review is not approved, you will be granted only one additional opportunity to revise and resubmit it. The final deadline for resubmission of the peer reviews is 2023-10-22.

1696197599 10/01/2023 11:59pm
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

Find Rubric
Please include a title
Find a Rubric
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5
Previous
Next
Exercise 5Next Module:
Week 6