Feed-back loop for projects

Justyna gives feed-back on Erionas project (can be found here).
Ellen gives feed-back on Justyna (can be found here).
Morgan gives feed-back on Ellen (can be found here).
Alice gives feed-back on Morgan (can be found here).
Eriona gives feed-back on Alice (can be found here).

May 23:rd 11:15 - 15:00 in room Physics:H421 (with Lunch break!)

We plan for 25 minutes for each presentation (15 min talk, 10 min feed-back).

11:15 - 11:40 Eriona Dullovi "Gender Bias in AI-based Recruiting" (Feed-back from Justyna Dubrowska)
11:40 - 12:05 Justyna Dobrowska "Gender and Racial Bias in Facial REcognition" (Feed-back from Ellen Maria Riefel)
13:15 - 13:40 Ellen Maria Riefel "Gender and Physics" (Feed-back from Morgan Langer)
13:40 - 14:05 Morgan Langer "Sex/Gender Differences and Prescription Drugs" (Feed-back from Alice Gales)
14:15 - 14:40 Alice Gales "Sex Bias and Omission in Neuroscience Research" (Feed-back by Eriona Dullovi)
15:00 Mingling before talk by Annelie Drakman

Some thoughts on giving feed-back

It is important that the atmosphere during a feed-back session remains positive and opens up for constructive discussions. Therefore, you should aim to be a "critical friend" and not an opponent - you are not there to win an argument but to help the presenter to improve their project and report. Be sure to give clear advice, with examples and suggestions. As an example, it is not enough to say "the report was interesting", but you have to add why it was interesting.

If you find some direct errors or mistakes that you would like to point out, it could be a good idea to notify the presenter in advance, to give them a chance to correct it. Minor comments on e.g. spelling could also be given after the oral feed-back in written form.