Lab 1 peer review

Note: You handin your review via the original lab 1 assignment.

You need to peer review two other  Lab 1 handins.

A good peer review should comment on the following

• Does the handin contain a presentation or report, and the code needed to reproduce the findings ? (Pass / Fail)
• Has data been properly investigated and handled ? (Yes/some issues/No)
• Has a reasonable selection of features been done, and motivated ? (Yes/some issues/No)
• Has a reasonable choice of modeling method(s) been done ? (Yes/some issues/No)
• Are choices of parameters described and motivated ? (Yes/some issues/No)
• Has the performance of each method been properly evaluated ? (Yes/some issues/No)

The peer reviews will be used as a base for the evaluation of the handins, but the final decision will be taken by the teaching staff. If something is lacking in the presentation, you might be asked to complete it and resubmit.